Pages: [1]
|
 |
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Explain This (Read 1085 times)
|
RTOYZ
TI Member
Offline
Posts: 1,092
301.00 credits
Virtual ATV:450cc View accesories
Send credits to RTOYZ
|
I have a weekend warrior fs3000, On a normal trip we have 4 quads, 20 gals of water in the tanks, lots of food and gear and fill the truck bed with fire wood. On average to the coast I get 12-12.5mpg. Last weekend I went down to So. Cal and picked up a small 16ft trailer that couldn't have weighed more than 5k, I got 11.9 pulling that thing home with nothing but a small suite case in the bed of my truck. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE???
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
2004.5 Dodge Cummins 2007 Weekend Warrior FSW3200/ With all the options 2005 Suzuki Z400 for the great wife 2006 Z400 mine 2005 Trx 450 Modded by Factory Honda 2008 250ex for the Goose. stock with steering stabilizer
|
|
|
|
|
DuneJunkie
DJ for short............
TI Staff
Offline
Posts: 1,182
100.00 credits
Virtual ATV:660cc View accesories
Send credits to DuneJunkie
|
What speed were you running? Same speed as on a dune trip? I have heard that fuel (yes diesel) and where you buy it, some makers of diesel burn differently, which cause better or worse mileage.............
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Towman 1
Offline
Posts: 130
75.00 credits
Virtual ATV:90cc View accesories
Send credits to Towman 1
|
Well I can tell you what is wrong, but you might not agree.
Living here on the central Oregon coast, when you go to Washington, you are going "UP" to Washington. When you go to California, you go "DOWN" to California. Now the way I am thinking, if you drove down to southern California and hooked on to that trailer, then you had to come up to get back to Oregon. Driving uphill takes more fuel.
Does this make sence ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
And on the seventh day, god went ATVing
|
|
|
RTOYZ
TI Member
Offline
Posts: 1,092
301.00 credits
Virtual ATV:450cc View accesories
Send credits to RTOYZ
|
I was running the same speed as always, and yes it makes a little sense that coming back from Cali, you are going uphill, but to get worse milage pulling 9k less seems crazy. My mechanic thinks the fuel down there is worse and that could be a part of it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
2004.5 Dodge Cummins 2007 Weekend Warrior FSW3200/ With all the options 2005 Suzuki Z400 for the great wife 2006 Z400 mine 2005 Trx 450 Modded by Factory Honda 2008 250ex for the Goose. stock with steering stabilizer
|
|
|
DuneJunkie
DJ for short............
TI Staff
Offline
Posts: 1,182
100.00 credits
Virtual ATV:660cc View accesories
Send credits to DuneJunkie
|
My mechanic thinks the fuel down there is worse and that could be a part of it.
I have done lots of reading on Diesel fuels since I bought mine. There differant manufactures do make differant "grades" of diesel, some burn hotter, some burn cooler, resulting in better or worse fuel economy. I know that I read a guy had done a test where he filled his truck with diesel from one company and made a drive. The next trip he made the same direction, same truck/weight, and his egt's (exhaust gas tempertaures) were up, his mileage was down, and a few other things, the only differance was the type of fuel he put in the night before his trip. I want to do some more reading on diesel fuel, and try to find out, what company is making better diesel. I am interested to know if Fred Meyer diesel (i don't know where they buy it from) (which is 3 cents cheaper in town) is any better or worse than Cheveron, Texaco, 76, or Shell. Anybody got any info?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DuneJunkie
DJ for short............
TI Staff
Offline
Posts: 1,182
100.00 credits
Virtual ATV:660cc View accesories
Send credits to DuneJunkie
|
Here is some information I found doing some research....................................
POWER Power is determined by engine design. Diesel engines are rated at the brake horsepower developed at the smoke limit.1 For a given engine, varying fuel properties within the ASTM D 975 specification range (see Figure 5-2) does not alter power significantly. For example, in one study seven fuels with varying distillation profiles and aromatics contents were tested in three engines. In each engine, power at peak torque and at rated speed (at full load) for the seven fuels was relatively constant. However, if fuel viscosity is outside of the D 975 specification range, combustion may be poor, resulting in loss of power and fuel economy.
FUEL ECONOMY Here again, engine design is more important than fuel properties. However, for a given engine used for a particular duty, fuel economy is related to the heating value of the fuel. Since diesel fuel is sold by volume, fuel economy is customarily expressed as output per unit volume e.g., miles per gallon. Therefore, the relevant units for heating value are heat per gallon (Btu per gallon). Heating value per gallon is directly proportional to density when other fuel properties are unchanged. ASTM specifications limit how much the heating value of a particular fuel can be increased. Increasing density involves changing the fuel's chemistry – by changing aromatics content – or changing its distillation profile by raising the initial boiling point, the end point, or both. Increasing aromatics is limited by the cetane number requirement (aromatics have lower cetane numbers); changing the distillation profile is limited by the 90% distillation temperature requirement.
Combustion catalysts may be the most vigorously promoted diesel fuel aftermarket additive (see Chapter 7). However, the Southwest Research Institute, under the auspices of the U.S. Transportation Research Board, ran back-to-back tests of fuels with and without a variety of combustion catalysts. These tests showed that a catalyst usually made "almost no change in either fuel economy or exhaust soot levels."2 While some combustion catalysts can reduce emissions, it is not surprising that they don't have a measurable impact on fuel economy. To be effective in improving fuel economy, a catalyst must cause the engine to burn fuel more completely. But there is not much room for improvement. With unadditized3 fuel, diesel engine combustion efficiency is typically greater than 98%. Ongoing design improvements to reduce emissions are likely to make diesel engines even more efficient.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chocks
Offline
Posts: 49
5.00 credits
Virtual ATV:50cc View accesories
Send credits to chocks
|
I was running the same speed as always, and yes it makes a little sense that coming back from Cali, you are going uphill, but to get worse milage pulling 9k less seems crazy. My mechanic thinks the fuel down there is worse and that could be a part of it.
Your mechanic (and dunejunkie) are right. Diesel quality varies greatly from station to station, even day to tday at the same station. I have filled my truck at Fred meyer before and got less that 10 MPG empty, the tank before I filled at the same Freddys and got over 18MPG. There is a truck stop on my way to work, that is where I always try to get my fuel..... usually fresh, and runs good in the truck  BTW: In Oregon there is no ASTM standard for Diesel or Avgas, therefore we are the dumping ground for "less than perfect" diesel in the northwest.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towman 1
Offline
Posts: 130
75.00 credits
Virtual ATV:90cc View accesories
Send credits to Towman 1
|
Well after reading DJ's reply, I like mine better. lol But I do think that buying diesel at different stations make a really big difference.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
And on the seventh day, god went ATVing
|
|
|
|
|
01350banshee
Offline
Posts: 31
0.00 credits
Virtual ATV:50cc View accesories
Send credits to 01350banshee
|
Depending on your vehicle. If it's a Dodge diesel check your fuel filter. Happens to many of them including mine on occasion.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
04.5 Lone Star Edition 2500 CTD 4X2 SLT SB QC. Deep Molten Red, 48RE, 3.73 w/AntiSpin, AFE Proguard 7 intake w/Pre-filter & Polished Aluminum down tube, Quadzilla Xzillaraider Standard Box, Donaldson 41" muffler. 05 Thor Wanderer 275WTB 01 Trinity/Toomey Banshee 01 Blaster 03 Kawasaki KDX
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
|
|